Mcleish or Clark ?

So Mcleish is the new boss at Forest and got me thinking.

Who is the worse manager McLeish or Clark ?

Difficult decision eh ?

What say you ?


Kro.

Clark

While he may be a muppet at least we're scoring 2 goals a game under him

Rather lose 3-2 than draw 0-0

bluenoseghag wrote:Clark

While he may be a muppet at least we're scoring 2 goals a game under him

Rather lose 3-2 than draw 0-0

We might be scoring a couple of goals a game under Clark but the football is rubbish !

Rubbish football under Clark.

Boring football under Mcleish.

Thank fekk for Chris Hughton.


kro

bluenosekev wrote:

bluenoseghag wrote:Clark

While he may be a muppet at least we're scoring 2 goals a game under him

Rather lose 3-2 than draw 0-0

We might be scoring a couple of goals a game under Clark but the football is rubbish !

Rubbish football under Clark.

Boring football under Mcleish.

Thank fekk for Chris Hughton.


kro

Never said it wasn't. We play like a league one side, no real quality but lots of scrappy football creating a few chances.

Still, shite football full of goals is better than shite football with no goals

No contest...CLARK!

Mrs_Ferguson wrote:No contest...CLARK!

Just knew you were gonna say that

You may be right for once

One word. NEITHER.

Without doubt Clark is the worse one out the 2.

While I will never forgive the Ginger rat for what he did or the boring tripe we had to watch he was on record Blues most successful manager ever and his overall managerial record shows this, and to be honest Clark is not even worthy of being compared to the guy on this basis

Yes one big difference shines through Mcleish was/is Tactically aware, Clark is totally Clueless.
Anything Clark does well happens more by chance than meaning ok so football under Clark is more exciting for the neutral compared to when Mcleish was in charge but was always a method in Mcleish's madness

hootie63 wrote: Mcleish was/is Tactically aware

At the time, almost everyone was saying the opposite.

Without a doubt, we were doing much better under Mcleish, but lets not look back with rose tinted glasses. The only good games were those that didn't matter.

Raters wrote:

hootie63 wrote: Mcleish was/is Tactically aware

Without a doubt, we were doing much better under Mcleish, but lets not look back with rose tinted glasses. The only good games were those that didn't matter.

So Wembley didn't matter?!!

You may not like Eck now but no denying he got Blues to their highest ever Prem position and won the Cup!

What has Clark done? Actually, irrespective of that if he had equalled Eck's achievement there still would be NO COMPARISION!

Eck is better than Clark. Far better.

SimonBCFC wrote:Eck is better than Clark. Far better.

I dunno.

Took us down twice did Eck. Football was mega boring week in week out under Eck.

Cant say the football is boring under Clark !

Mrs_Ferguson wrote:

Raters wrote:

hootie63 wrote: Mcleish was/is Tactically aware

Without a doubt, we were doing much better under Mcleish, but lets not look back with rose tinted glasses. The only good games were those that didn't matter.

So Wembley didn't matter?!!

You may not like Eck now but no denying he got Blues to their highest ever Prem position and won the Cup!

What has Clark done? Actually, irrespective of that if he had equalled Eck's achievement there still would be NO COMPARISION!

Of course it matters. And yes re had a best unbeaten run won a cup etc, but the football was boring. Would I take that over what we have, YES

Mcleish was shite, but was lucky
Clark is shite, but isn't